A recent study discussed in the
New York Times on 25 Nov examined the sequence of solar and lunar
eclipses that the Antikythera Mechanism is able to display and concluded
that the earliest available date was 205 B.C.
'Beginning with the hundreds of ways that
the Antikythera [Mechanism]’s eclipse patterns could fit Babylonian records ... the team used their
system to eliminate dates successively, until they had a single
possibility.
The calculations take into account lunar and solar anomalies (which
result in faster or slower velocity), missing solar eclipses, lunar and
solar eclipses
cycles, and other astronomical phenomena."
"This suggests the mechanism is 50–100 years
older than most researchers in the field have thought."'(1)
Frankly,
I don't see how that final conclusion would arise from the evidence
presented. Did it not come to the researchers' mind that the maker of
the Antikythera Mechanism may have wanted his gear to calculate back
into the past? The astronomy software installed on my computer is able
to trace the movements of the heavens back to 2712 B.C. - is that
conclusive evidence that king Sargon of Akkad ordered its making? At its
best, the date of 205 B.C. suggests a terminus quo ante, that
is: It is unlikely that the mechanism was crafted before that year
because its maker would certainly have wanted it to be useful in his own
time, not after some arbitrary date in the future. The commonly
accepted age of the Antikythera Mechanism, however, is unchallenged in
my opinion.
The
argument about whether the workshop that built the Antikythera
Mechanism was located in Sicily or in Rhodes is back at full volume, NYT
also reports:
'An
inscription on a small dial used to date the Olympic Games refers to an
athletic competition that was held in Rhodes, according to research by
Paul Iversen, a Greek scholar at Case Western Reserve University.'(2)
Keine Kommentare :
Kommentar veröffentlichen